Restrictions on complement anaphora
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Resolving Complement Anaphora
In a quantified expression, the possibility of referring to the set-theoretical difference of restrictor and scope is known as complement anaphora (CA). Existing literature suggests two ways of analyzing this phenomenon either as confusion with reference to the maximal set, or as genuine complement reference. This paper will show that resolving an anaphor to the complement set is never a viable...
متن کاملComplement anaphora and the plurality of worlds
In a nutshell We present novel data from German revealing an striking similarity in the behavior of complement anaphora (CA) in different domains (possible worlds, times, individuals): We argue that the distribution of CA in the domain of individuals requires the antecedent quantifier to provide a plurality. We show that the correlation of quantifier types and the availability of CA with condit...
متن کاملConstraints on metalinguistic anaphora*
Just as it is possible to refer to any entity, concrete or abstract, in extralinguistic reality, it is also possible to refer to any linguistic entity, be that a phoneme, a word, a sentence, or any other linguistic object. Metalinguistic reference can be achieved in two ways, by means of ‘autonymous’ and ‘heteronymous’ mention (cf. Recanati 2000: 137). Autonymous mention is a matter of quotatio...
متن کاملOn Plural Anaphora
In order to formulate truth-conditionally satisfactor* semantics in a compositional. manner, model-iiieoretic semanticists sometimes posit morphology-semantics mismatches. Among them are Kamp and Reyle (1993), who occasionally ignore English plural morphology in constructing their analysis of anaphora. Our goal in this paper is to demonstrate that natural language morphology is a better guide f...
متن کاملRemarks On Plural Anaphora
The interpretation of plural anaphora often requires the construction of complex reference objects (RefOs) out of RefOs which were formerly introduced not by plural terms but by a number of singular terms only. Often, several complex RefOs can be constructed, but only one of them is the preferred referent for the plural anaphor in question. As a means of explanation for preferred and non-prefer...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Semantics and Linguistic Theory
سال: 2017
ISSN: 2163-5951
DOI: 10.3765/salt.v27i0.4146